2003/03/28
Germany: Making Globalization Equitable
Social Watch
Only the successful creation of a broad social participation in issues of international economic policy will make it possible to counter the social and ecological reprehensibility of neo-liberal globalization with a globalization of social justice and ecological sustainability.
DGB (German Federation of Trade Unions, VENRO
(Association of German Development NGOs) and Attac have set the goal of
demanding that the new Federal Government and the newly elected Bundestag
take on greater commitment for a socially and ecologically more equitable world
order with a democratic countenance.
The declaration is the result of an intensive
debate carried out over the past two years concerning the political challenges
of globalization. At the same time DGB, VENRO and Attac demonstrate with this
declaration that they and their respective member organizations – in spite of
the existing differences of their respective social policy fields of action –
wish to actively support and co-design this process jointly as actors in civil
society. Representatives of the Forum Umwelt und Entwicklung, the Forum
Menschenrechte and of the Social Watch Deutschland-Forum Weltsozialgipfel, which
uphold its fundamental objectives, also took part in drawing up this
declaration.
----------------------------------------------
Global
markets must be based on global regulations and institutions that place humane
development and the public welfare before the interests of enterprises and
national advantages. A return to a nation state focused policy is not a
desirable alternative.
Globalization
in the form of a great increase in the exchange of goods, investment flows and
financial capital has come to influence nearly all fields of politics and in
many aspects has contributed to polarization and differentiation.
For
example, in its final report dated June 2002, the Commission of Inquiry
“Globalization of the World Economy” of the German Bundestag ascertains:
“We observe that around the world the gap between the poor and the rich is
continually growing further. In the world as a whole, the gap between the most
prosperous fifth and the poorest fifth of the global populations has doubled in
the past decades.”
Even
if developing and threshold countries have increased their share in world trade
on the whole in the past twenty years, only a few of them were able to increase
their share in the world income, while the poorest developing countries are
practically excluded from the world market.
In
industrialized countries, the international division of labour accelerates
structural change. Hereby less well-qualified workers tend to have more
difficulties on the labour market than well-qualified employees in highly
productive and innovative sectors.
Intensified
liberalization of trade and the activities of multinational corporations are
accompanied by considerable hazards to economic and social rights. Also, in many
countries grave limits to civil and political rights are still part of the daily
agenda. Until now it has not yet been possible to realize the programmatic
objectives of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 or to
effectively implement the two UN covenants
on civil and social rights.
Globalization
in its present dominant form did not generate itself. The expansion and hence
the intensification of global competition were politically intended. Decisive
driving forces were not only the enterprises, but also the governments of the
USA, Japan and the EU member states. They paved the way for liberalization of
markets and to cutting the totality of public services. Influence of the
parliaments is practically non-existent, and the direct influence of the
citizens on the decisions that directly affect them is minimal. On principle,
though, the vast advancements in the information and communication technologies
offer new opportunities for global cooperation in solidarity.
Globalization
needs a social and democratic countenance. It is not a matter of escaping
globalization, but of politically shaping it.
1. The
fight against poverty
The
present global political situation makes clear more than ever how important it
is to eliminate the extreme injustices and inequalities on earth with all the
power at our disposal. Battling extreme worldwide poverty is a precept of
solidarity and a human rights duty. At its Millennium Summit in September 2000,
the United Nations resolved to cut the number of the extremely poor in the world
(now roughly 1.2 billion people) in half by the year 2015. Achieving the
objectives formulated in the UN Millennium Declaration – according to World
Bank calculations – will require not only a change in global structures, but
also a doubling of worldwide development aid (now roughly €50 billion). The
Federal Government supported the objectives of the UN and put them into concrete
terms in its “Aktionsprogramm 2015” resolved in April 2001. It is now a
matter of also implementing the objectives sketched by this Action Programme.
Germany, as one of the richest countries in the world, must take up greater
international responsibility than it has in the past. Greater coherence of
overall policies with the aims of the fight against poverty and of sustainable
development is important. We in particular demand:
§
that the Federal Government produce a binding
time schedule ensured by a law on development policy, so that German development
financing (ODA) can be doubled by the end of the present legislative period and
its share in the gross national income (GNI) of currently 0.27 percent be
increased to 0.7 percent in the year 2010;
§
that the Federal Government multilaterally work
for a further-reaching remission of debts for the Heavily Indebted Poor
Countries (HIPCs) and for new mechanisms for permanent disencumberment (in
particular a fair and transparent insolvency procedure). Also the IWF and World
Bank must turn from the previous policy of structural adjustment obligations;
§
that the debate on innovative funding sources on
an international level (such as Tobin Tax or use fees for global common goods)
be actively pushed ahead;
§
that German development cooperation focus
regionally primarily on the Low Income countries (LICs) and Least Developed
Countries (LDCs);
§
that all measures of German development
cooperation, including its investment projects, be largely orientated by sector
to the following areas:
- directly to fight against poverty and to social services (such as education,
health, water supply, ensuring food and social security);
- human rights, including core labour standards;
- environmental protection;
- the needs of women and the population of rural regions.
§
that the Federal Government work towards a better
use and further development of the UN agreements on human rights, in particular
with regard to drawing up a behavioural code for the right to food;
§
that coherence problems be eliminated and that
the development policy tolerability of German and European agricultural and
foreign trade policies be ensured, particularly through the eradication of all
ecologically and socially damaging export subsidies.
2.
Sustainable development and environmental protection
In
the last two centuries, industrialization and greater use of the soil have led
to a drastic expansion of the consumption of natural resources and hence to
global environmental problems. The global greenhouse effect, the increase in UV
rays and certain types of pollution are worldwide phenomena. Tropical and
subtropical regions are particularly affected by the changing climate due to an
accumulation of extreme weather events. The recent flooding catastrophes in
Europe show that not only the developing countries bear the brunt of these
environmental catastrophes, but also increasingly the rich countries, which now
get a taste of what it means when there are not enough financial and technical
means to take compensatory and assistance measures. The poor population in
especially affected by the extreme weather events, having no escape options.
Global environmental policy therefore is crucially related to the fight against
poverty and must begin chiefly in the industrialized countries, which are the
principle causers of many global environmental problems.
We
therefore demand:
§
New global funding instruments must be introduced
to realize the environmental and development targets of Johannesburg. An
important role can be played by globally uniform charges for the use of global
common goods such as air space and the seas. The Federal Government should take
up the relevant proposals of its Scientific Advisory Council on Environmental
Changes (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat Globale Umweltveränderungen - WBGU) without
delay and take the required initiatives in the competent international bodies.
One first step in this direction should be the EU-wide repeal of tax exemption
for aviation fuel. Subsidies with detrimental environmental effects must be
drastically cut down or reformed. Comprehensive agricultural reforms are needed.
Agricultural subsidies must be aligned to social, ecological and animal
protection services. The agricultural reform proposed by the European Commission
must be supported.
§
Before further steps are taken in the bilateral
and multilateral liberalization of trade, their effects on the environment,
poverty, social circumstances and development should be examined. Studies by
independent experts and the equal participation of social interest groups are
needed.
§
Priority of multilateral environmental
conventions over the trade and investment provisions of the WTO.
§
Nuclear energy may not be defined as a
sustainable form of energy production, as the European Commission attempted to
do in early summer.
§
At the same time it is essential that the share
of domestic renewable energy sources be further expanded.
3.
Reform of the international financial architecture
The
present structures of the deregulated global financial markets are responsible
for the instabilities and financial crises of the past decade. Modern
communication technologies, new financial market products such as derivates and
speculative hedge funds enabled the short-term mobility of previously
unimaginable financial masses and promoted speculation attacks on national
currencies. Financial market crises are linked with huge social costs in the
affected countries and have contributed to enlarging the economic and social
inequalities of the world.
In
view of the global character of the present economic weakness, international
cooperation in economic policy is dreadfully meagre. In particular in the field
of exchange rate policy, the lack of cooperation by the G3 (USA, Euroland and
Japan) has negative consequences. There is a lack of “crash barriers” for
the exchange rates, which could credibly be asserted vis-à-vis the foreign
exchange market. This lack narrows the leeway for growth-promoting, confident
short-term economic policy and impedes the overcoming of recessive tendencies
that have lasted since the second half of the 1990s. In addition the trade and
credit relationships of the threshold countries are impaired by the high
fluctuation intensities of the exchange rates. Uncontrolled sudden price drops
such as those in Brazil, Argentina or Turkey create huge macro and microeconomic
problems, which extend far beyond the borders of the country directly affected.
Considerable
reforms are therefore necessary so that the potentially beneficial function of
the financial markets can be effective for sustainable economic development.
Financial
markets need a solid institutional framework, which limits speculation and
controls illegal movements of funds.
We
therefore demand:
§
Stricter duties of disclosure for the banks,
risk-adapted minimum reserves and tougher banking supervisory provisions, to
promote great risk awareness. However, small and medium-sized enterprises may
not be cut off from the supply of credit and may not be discriminated against
with poorer ratings by comparison to larger enterprises.
§
Creditors must bear a larger part of the disencumberment
costs when their behaviour leads to states coming into financial market crises
or payment difficulties (bail-in). The development of an international
bankruptcy and insolvency law, the formation of committees of creditors, debt
rescheduling clauses and the approval of moratoria can serve this purpose. Also,
intensified monitoring and controls of derivates and over the counter trading
are necessary.
§
A market-economic instrument to restrict
financial fluctuations is an increase in transaction costs of capital flows.
This should be effected with a currency transaction tax, stricter equity capital
provisions for banks, a registry of loans or enterprises at the Bank for
International Settlements as well as the regulation of financial and tax havens.
§
Promotion of the establishment of functional and
stabile national financial systems in developing countries. Controls on the
movement of capital can also be a good instrument for protecting the financial
markets of developing and threshold countries.
§
Improved cooperation by the three major currency
regions of the dollar, the euro and the yen, in order to overcome the recessive
tendencies in the global economy and regain short-term economic policy leeway.
§
Effective controls of tax havens and unregulated
offshore financial centres. In addition to the improvement of such international
initiatives, the haven countries must be included in an exchange of information
between national regulatory authorities and the eradication of the excessive
banking secrecy. Additionally the offshore business of domestic enterprises must
also be subjected to intensified investigations on the part of the German
financial regulatory authorities
§
Sanctions against those countries cited on the
OECD blacklists of uncooperative financial centres.
In
the scope of the OECD project on harmful tax practices, over 30 offshore
financial centrers have committed themselves to the principles of transparency
and information exchange. Now, relevant legislation should be rapidly
implemented and applied in these financial centres.
4.
Working to shape social world trade
The
DGB and its member unions, the German non-governmental organizations and
movements in environment and development policy advocate just participation of
developing countries in world trade and social economic policy on an
international level. This encompasses:
§
the elimination of trade barriers vis-à-vis
developing countries (e.g. export subsidies in agriculture, escalation of
customs duties, import restrictions, antidumping);
§
prolongation of the implementation deadlines of
the Uruguay Round;
§
the possibility for exceptions in certain
liberalization obligations in order to promote sustainable development in
developing countries. If necessary, existing conventions must be amended. The
need for reforms in intellectual property rights (protection of species
diversity and life-saving drugs) and in the agriculture sector to ensure the
food security (introduction of a development box) is apparent;
§
the integration of fundamental workers’ and
human rights as well as ecological minimum standards in the multilateral trade
and investment regimes;
§
for this purpose, a standing forum between the
International Labour Organization, the World Trade Organization and other
international institutions should be established;
§
another module in the scope of a structured
cooperation between the international organizations is the observer status for
the International Labour Organization at the WTO, the IWF and the World Bank;
§
strengthening the International Labour
Organization and its financial means for implementing the internationally
accepted Core Labour Standards;
§
placing Core Labour Standards on the agenda of
bilateral trade policy of the European Union;
§
making the ILO Core Labour Standards, the
internationally accepted environmental standards of the World Bank and the
international conventions for the protection of human rights criteria for the
granting of investment guarantees and for export credit guarantees in
developing countries.
5. No
unrestricted liberalization of the service markets
Internationally
traded services are a new topic in world trade. This sector is considered the
most dynamic growth sector, reaching a value of $1.34 billion in the year 1999
alone, or one fifth of world trade. Particularly because liberalization of the
services market affects the future market and social order of the global labour
market, the anchoring of the universally accepted ILO Core Labour Standards in
the WTO Agreement is crucial. Migrating workers in particular must have the
opportunity to organize in trade unions and conclude collective bargaining
negotiations. It also cannot be accepted that the regulation of the services
market – especially of the public sector – is a trade barrier and therefore
that international obligations aim at evading EU law or that the right of
nations to higher quality standards and norms is restricted as distortions of
competition.
We
therefore demand:
§
that distinct market order principles be
observed. Public services and important social service sectors, such as
education, health, environment and water, must be excluded from the General
Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). For this it is necessary to make the
unclear GATS provisions on sovereign tasks more precise. The WTO countries must
continue to have the right to regulate their own public services;
§
that market opening for financial services should
only take place in national economies with developed financial institutions,
which can deal with the liberalization of the financial market. This does not
exclude temporarily restricted capital movement controls;
§
that a universal supply of affordable and high
quality services is guaranteed by the principle of universal services (e.g.
telecommunications);
§
that social and ecological composition of
competition in the transport sector is necessary to balance out external costs;
§
that a sustainable market order for tourism
services is strived for, dedicated to the protection of natural and cultural
environments;
§
that social order principles must prevent unfair
trade caused by social and wage dumping in the electronics trade, in freedom of
establishment, in public procurement and in cross-border freedom to provide
services;
§
that GATS obligations not be taken up in the case
of serious market disturbances (unemployment, wage and price dumping). If
liberalization obligations have already been taken up and should such serious
market disturbances occur, it must be possible to defer the GATS obligations for
a temporary period;
§
that the work place and favourability principles
with regard to wages, working conditions and workers’ rights be generally
anchored in the GATS agreement;
§
that the German Federal Government therefore
advocate a European policy in the totality of public services.
6.
Regulations for multinational enterprises
The
political reformation of globalization processes must also be accompanied by a
binding regulation on the activities of multinational corporations.
Multinational enterprises must acknowledge their social, ecological and human
rights responsibilities and obligations and take these into consideration in
their actions. Voluntary standards or codes of conduct are an important first
step, but are not enough. The objective must be the creation of legally binding
international regulations with effective controlling mechanisms and sanctions.
The draft of the UN Subcommission on the Promotion and Protection of Human
Rights or the International Framework Convention on Corporate Accountability
proposed in Johannesburg by the trade unions and NGOs can serve as the basis for
such regulations.
In
the meantime, we expect of the Federal Government:
§
that it vigorously follow up on its obligation to
promote the implementation and application of the OECD Guidelines for
Multinational Enterprises (MNEs), for example through information and public
relations work as well as relevant consulting programmes;
§
that all interested social groups be equally
involved in the work of the national contact office according to the principles
of transparency and accountability;
§
that it vigorously demand that multinational
enterprises headquartered in Germany comply with the OECD Guidelines and with
the ILO Code of Conduct for Multinational Enterprises in all of their social
activities, including the cooperation with supplier enterprises; in this context
it should encourage enterprises to conclude framework agreements with the trade
unions;
§
that it only then grant export credit and
investment guarantees when the applicant enterprises pledge to comply with the
OECD Guidelines.
This
raises the issue of a suitable international code of rules for foreign direct
investments.
We
do not fundamentally reject such a code of rules. A multilateral investment
framework, which links basic investment protection for direct investments to the
compliance with international environmental and social norms and includes them
in the development policy priorities of the investment country, could strengthen
the contribution of direct investments to development and employment as well as
to higher social and ecological standards.
At
the WTO Ministerial Conference in Doha, the subjects of investments and
competition were taken up for the work programme of the WTO for the next 2
years.
However,
the WTO is not the suitable framework for these subjects; for the objective of
the governments that advocate investment negotiations in the WTO is solely to
liberalize national investment regimes and to limit already restricted national
regulation competencies. In addition, the application of general WTO principles
such as national treatment of investments can stand in the way of development
policy objectives, for example if preferential treatment of resident small and
medium-sized enterprises is needed to form a solid industrial basis. In the
past, the negotiations in GATT and WTO have brought about little progress in the
priority for international environmental agreements and entirely ignored human
rights and core labour standards. This is no foundation upon which an investment
order can be expected within the WTO, the aim of which is not liberalization,
but rather development and social progress.
We
therefore demand that the Federal Government:
§
advocate an international investment order beyond
the WTO, which is based on minimum social, environmental and human rights
standards. An international investment order may not undermine governmental
freedom of action, but must expressly enable the government of the investment
country to set investment conditions according to its own opinions and decisions
about the development process.
§
The preliminary WTO negotiations regarding
competition are also headed in the wrong direction. We therefore demand:
§
an international competition authority capable of
intervention, which is given the responsibility for controlling major mergers,
market-dominating positions and business practices that restrict competition.
Such an institution should be situated outside the WTO due to the possible
conflict of objectives in trade and competition policy. For on the basis of
objectives made for the public welfare, such as Universal Service Obligations,
restricting market access and granting certain exclusive rights, e.g. regional
monopolies of local waterworks, may be justified.
Because
of location competition for investments, many governments have allowed for tax
competition that endangers the income foundations of the states. Hence, the tax
burden has continually developed to the advantage of the enterprises and to the
disadvantage of wage-earners and consumers.
We
therefore demand that the Federal Government do all that is possible to restrict
unfair international tax competition in corporate taxes and to achieve a minimum
taxation of enterprises also internationally.
For
this purpose, the following measures may be suitable:
§
long-term harmonization of the bases of
assessment and alignments, perhaps also harmonization of tax rates within the
EU;
§
short-term consistent application of the
headquarter country principle. The tax authorities of the investment country
should notify the tax authorities of the headquarter country of the profits of
internationally active enterprises. Subsequent taxation can then be made if
foreign taxation was less than domestic taxation.
7.
Democratization of the globalization process
The
signers of this declaration agree that extensive democratization is also part of
the political design of the globalization process. Since neo-liberal
globalization is being pushed forward on national, regional (European) and
international levels, all of these levels require democratization. A smooth
transition for the advancing liberalization of trade is being paved, for
instance, in the Federal capital of Berlin, in the EU Commission in Brussels as
well as at the headquarters of the WTO in Geneva. However, in all of these three
cities, civil social groups (trade unions, non-governmental organizations, civic
movements) have less ease of access to information than the lobbies of industry.
Often even parliamentarians are informed by the respective competent ministries
late, poorly or misleadingly. Nevertheless, effective participation is not only
limited to equal access to information. It also requires hearing rights and
procedures for the early involvement of civil social actors in important
international economic policy decisions.
But
democratization of the globalization process also involves distinct improvement
of the representation of the developing countries and their respective civil
societies in international institutions. In many cases this requires the
development of democratic structures and sufficient capacities in these
countries. It must be remembered that democracy needs proximity. Effective
political participation demands that decisions are made as locally as possible
and as internationally as needed. Which concrete decisions should be made best
on which levels must be reconsidered case-by-case.
We
therefore demand of the Federal Government:
§
that it support the democratization processes and
efforts made in developing countries through counselling and funding the
establishment of democratic institutions and structures;
§About
Germany
About Social Watch
in
Germany
Publications by Social Watch Focal Point in Germany
See news about
Germany
|