2003/03/22
NGOs launch campaign against investment agreement
"El Comercio", Lima, Peru
Forty non-governmental organizations from different continents
announced today a campaign focusd on stopping the launch of negotiations
in the World Trade Organization (WTO) on a multilateral investment
agreement, which they consider harmful for developing countries.
Geneva. Forty non-governmental organizations from different continents
announced today a campaign focusd on stopping the launch of negotiations
in the World Trade Organization (WTO) on a multilateral investment
agreement, which they consider harmful for developing countries.
Among the NGOs are Oxfam, the Center for Consumer Defense of El
Salvador, Public Citizen from the United States., the Third World
Institute from Uruguay, REBRIP from Brasil, the Solon Foundation from
Bolivia, and the Third World Network, along with others from Denmark,
Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Senegal and Malaysia.
In the press conference announcing the campaign, the NGOs warned that the
agreement being pushed by the U.S., the European Union (EU) and Japan will
create a corporate bill of rights that will fundamentally favor
multinational corporations while at the same time eviserating the ability
of governments to regulate foreign investment.
"This type of agreement will tie the hands of governments and will make
developing countries extremely vulnerable to financial crises as well as
facilitating the control of multinational corporations over local
businesses and economies," declared Martin Khor of the Third World Network
from Malaysia.
British citizen Peter Hardstaff, from the World Development Movement
based in the United Kingdom, noted that the industrial countries of
today became rich by regulating investment and "discriminating" [between
types of investment], a soverign right that these countries now want to
deny developing countries.
Salvadoran Raul Moreno of the Hemispheric Social Alliance of the
Americas predicted that an agreement such as the one proposed would have a
negative impact from a economic, social and environmental viewpoint, as
this is already happening in Mexico, said Moreno, as a result of the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
The NAFTA agreement has already produced more than twenty court cases
between the U.S., Canada and Mexico and the [NAFTA] tribunals have forced
governments to pay millions of dollars in compensation to multinational
corporations for having ordered, for example, the closing of a toxic waste
plant, as happened in San Luis Potosí (Mexico), Moreno said.
Another case mentioned by Moreno for its significance is that of the
U.S. corporation Bechtel which sued the Bolivian government for US$25
million, alleging that it never got profits promised when it took control
of the administration of water services in Cochabamba because it was
forced to abandon operations there after popular protests against water
price hikes.
Bechtel is suing the Bolivian government in the International Center
for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), an agency of the World
Bank, after having established an address in Holland in order to use an
investment treaty between that country and Bolivia given the lack of a
simliar agreement [allowing private enforcement of investor rights]
between Bolivia and the U.S.
Moreno noted, on the other hand, that the type of investment that goes to
Mexico and Central America are in the area of unskilled labor - which
generates employment that is both precarious and poor quality - because
in many o f these countries there are not national employment/labor
policies, which in turn allows foreign companies to establish themselves
"without giving anything back."
Moreno gave the example of his country, El Salvador, which exports
about 65% of its total production to the U.S., 90% of which is from the
maquiladoras (fundamentally in the textile sector), only to have a large
part of these exports re-imported [to El Salvador], but as more expensive
goods after having had well-known U.S. brand names attached to them.
"For all of these reasons, we insist that the WTO member countries
reject the plans for an investment agreement," said Celine Charveriat of
Oxfam. According to Chaveriat, WTO members should focus on reaching
agreement in agriculture and other areas of interest for the developing
world such as special and diferential treatment and access to medicines.
The NGO representatives said that they will be present to lobby against
the agreement in the next meeting of the G8 in Evian (France) next June,
during the WTO Minsiterial planned for the middle of september in Cancun
(Mexico) and at the next Free Trade Area of the Americas Ministerial
Meeting in Miami (U.S.) in November.
(Translation by Timi Gerson, Public Citizen, original in Spanish published by "El Comercio", Lima, March 21, 2003)
|