1999
Advancing towards a gender FCI in Latin America
Commitments related to gender in Latin America were monitored by means of a survey of civil society organisations. The survey gathered information on a variety of aspects, including existence of information discriminated by sex, feminisation of poverty, existence of policies specifically geared to women, women's participation in the job market, and women's political participation. It also gathered information on the existence of Beijing follow-up commissions at government level, as well as the degree of effective coordination between government agencies in charge of follow-up and civil society organisations. Eight countries responded to the questionnaire, and on the basis of those responses some general assessments have been made regarding the condition of women in Latin America. For the next edition of Social Watch we expect to include all Latin American and Caribbean countries in the Fulfilled Commitments Index (FCI) regarding the implementation of the Action Platform of the Fourth World Conference on Women.
Information broken down by gender is fairly complete
in those Latin American countries where it is available,1
with the exception of Guatemala, as seen in Table 1. This
information shows, however, that little progress has been
made on some gender issues. Limited information is
available in Latin America on the magnitude and
characteristics of poverty among the female population.
In the majority of countries2, including Brazil, Bolivia,
Peru and Guatemala, this information is not available.
Considering the crucial importance of the issues, this
lack of break-down is particularly significant. Little
progress has been made in generating information on the
economic weight of non-remunerated domestic work
performed by women, which was a key commitment in
Beijing. Only Venezuela seems to be taking some
initiative in this direction.
Latin American prospects for reducing female poverty
are likewise discouraging. For those countries where
information does exist, Venezuela and Guatemala show a
very high percentage of households headed by women
without spouses living in a situation of poverty; in
Uruguay and Chile, the percentage is lower. Female
poverty increased in Brazil, Venezuela and Guatemala.
This increased incidence is linked to the absence, in
most countries, of anti-poverty plans. In the only
countries with such plans, Paraguay and Chile, female
poverty has dropped.
As regards the existence of policies and plans with a
gender perspective, civil society organisations report
that there are such plans in Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia
and Guatemala. In Bolivia, which has created a National
Gender Affairs Office, and Guatemala, with an Equity Plan
for the Year 2000, these plans and policies are more
ambitious. They are more specific and limited in the case
of Brazil. In Uruguay, Venezuela and Peru such
initiatives have not been implemented, although
there were some isolated initiatives in Peru. In the
same countries that show political will in this area
-Brazil, Paraguay, Chile and Bolivia- we should note the
existence of equal opportunities plans, at different
stages of design and implementation. These countries,
along with Venezuela, also have plans for combating
gender discrimination in education. Finally, all
countries have specific policies and institutions geared
to eliminating violence against women.
In the employment area, the panorama is not very
encouraging for Latin American women. Only Brazil, Chile
and Bolivia indicated that they have plans that address
better and broader incorporation of women in the job
market. Female employment rates are extremely high,
exceeding 40%, with the exception of Chile. Female
employment has decreased in Brazil (1% between 1995 and
1996) and Venezuela (1% between 1995 and 1998). It has
increased in Paraguay (3% between 1972 and 1992), Bolivia
(2% between 1995 and 1996) and Peru (12% between 1994 and
1996). It is stagnated in Guatemala, Chile and Uruguay.
Female unemployment rates are extremely high in Bolivia,
Chile, Venezuela and Uruguay, exceeding 14%. In the rest
of the countries they are in the area of 8% to 10%.
Female unemployment tends to be increasing in all the
countries.
The data on under-employment is meager. In the three
countries for which we have data, it is alarming. Under-
employment reaches 18.9% of women in Paraguay, 39% of
women in Uruguay, and 49.9% of women in Peru. Only
Paraguay reports the existence of initiatives geared to
combating female under-employment. No plans for job
training for (re)insertion of women in the job market
were reported. Latin American women continue to earn less
than 70% of what men earn for the same job. The
percentages of wage discrimination are shown in Table 3.
Women's political participation continues to be very
low in Latin America. Participation in the executive
branch of government of Brazilian, Bolivian, Venezuelan,
Uruguayan, Peruvian and Guatemalan women is less than
10%. Worse still, in the case of Brazil and Peru, it has
decreased between 1995 and 1998. The same thing is
happening with the participation of women in the
legislature, although participation in parliament has
increased in Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay and Chile (in the
latter case, the number of women in the house of
representatives increased, but there was a slight drop in
the already low percentage of senators). Only Paraguay
maintains high participation, close to 20% in both
branches of government.
The situation of women in the judiciary is quite
different, exceeding 20% in Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia,
Peru, Chile and Guatemala, and over 50% in Venezuela and
Uruguay. Additionally, all the countries reporting at
least two types of data show a positive evolution of the
participation of women in the judiciary.
The participation of women in municipal governments
continues to be exceptionally low, even lower than in the
legislative and executive branches. Women's participation
on party ballots is under 20% in Brazil and Paraguay. It
is more positive in Bolivia and Venezuela with
percentages of over 30%, and more negative in Guatemala
with 9.6%. The rest of the countries did not provide
information on this aspect. The majority of countries,
with the exception of Uruguay and Peru, have implemented
positive discrimination mechanisms (such as quotas).
Finally, we note that half the countries report the
existence of official follow-up commissions. There are no
such commissions in the other half, including Peru,
Guatemala, Bolivia, Chile and Venezuela.
Table 1.
Existence
of information broken down by gender in Latino
America |
|
BRAZIL |
PARAGUAY |
BOLIVIA |
VENEZUELA |
URUGUAY |
PERU |
GUATEMALA |
CHILE |
Access
to education services |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
(by
education level) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
Schooling |
X
|
X |
X |
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
Female
enrollment in tertiary studies |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
Job
market: female employment and unemployment rates |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
Female
EAP by sectors and branches of activity |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
Female
population in the informal sector |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Number
of single-parent homes (women heads of household
with no spouse) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
Incidence
of poverty on female population |
|
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Women's
access to health care services |
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Wage
discrimination |
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
Child
labour |
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initiatives
to assess the economic weight of women's
non-remunerated domestic work |
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2.
Policies toward women in Latin
America
|
|
BRAZIL |
PARAGUAY |
BOLIVIA |
VENEZUELA |
URUGUAY |
PERÚ |
GUATEMALA |
CHILE |
Countries
having plans to combat female poverty |
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Countries
where there is Govt./Civil Society cooperation on
gender programmes |
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
Countries
whose policies include gender perspective |
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Countries
with equal opportunities plan |
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Countries
with initiatives geared to formulating an equal
opportunities plan |
|
|
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
Countries
with plans to combat gender discrimination in
education |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
Countries
with plans to improve quality and coverage of
reproductive health plans |
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
Countries
with policies to combat violence against women |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Countries
with plans to incorporate women in the job market |
X
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Countries
with plans to combat female unemployment |
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countries
with plans to combat under-emplolyment |
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countries
with job training plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countries
with policies to combat child labour |
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countries
with programmes to broaden women's access to
credit, land and production resources |
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Existence
of positive discrimination mechanisms |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Table 3
TABLE 3: DATA ON WOMEN IN LATIN AMERICA:
EMPLOYMENT, POVERTY AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
|
BRAZIL
|
PARAGUAY
|
BOLIVIA
|
VENEZUELA
|
URUGUAY
|
PERU
|
GUATE
MALA
|
CHILE
|
Evolution of poverty
|
Increased
|
Decreased
|
n/d
|
Increased
|
n/d
|
n/d
|
Increased
|
Decreased
|
% homes with female heads of household in
situation of poverty
|
n/d
|
n/d
|
n/d
|
65%
|
22%
|
n/d
|
43%
|
19.3%
|
% wage discrimination
|
54%
|
62.5%
|
68.29%
|
70%
|
62.5%
|
8.1%
|
n/d
|
60%
|
% women in Executive Branch
|
5%
|
18.2%
|
10%
|
8.7%
|
7.7%
|
7%
|
10%
|
15.7%
|
% women in Legislature
|
Repre
sentatives: 9.1%
Senate: 7.1%
|
18.9%
|
9%
|
6.5%
|
Re
presentatives:
7%
Senate: 6.7%
|
11%
|
13.8%
|
Repre
sentatives:
10.8%
Senate: 4.1%
|
% women in Judiciary
|
25.1%
|
20.32%
|
20.77%
|
59.0%
|
55%
|
19.9%
|
18.6%
|
Supreme
court: 0%
Court of appeals: 19.1%
|
% women in municipal government
|
Prefects:
5.9%
Governors: 3.7%
|
Governors:
2.73%
|
Mayors: 6%
City Council:
9%
Prefects: 0%
|
6.7%
|
0%
|
Mayors and City Council members: 3.5%
Provincial
mayors: 3.2%
|
1.7%
|
Governors: 9.8%
Mayors:
7.2%
|
% women on party ballots
|
14%
|
18.18%
|
32%
|
30.4%
|
n/d
|
n/d
|
9.6%
|
n/d
|
% women union leaders
|
14%
|
8.24%
|
10%
|
n/d
|
8%
|
n/d
|
n/d
|
15%
|
Table 4
FOLLOW-UP
ON BEIJING AGREEMENTS |
Follow-up
on
Beijing |
BRAZIL |
PARA
GUAY |
BOLIVIA |
VENE
ZUELA |
URU
GUAY |
PERU |
GUA
TEMALA |
CHILE |
Countries
having a World Women’s Summit follow-up
commission |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Countries
having mechanisms for government-NGO coordination
and co-participation |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countries
having assessments and
reports |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
|
|
Notes:
1 The
information furnished by civil society organizations in
the questionnaire on the condition of women was very rich
and permitted extensive specification on each point.
2
Venezuela: Juntas por Venezuela (national meeting point
that bring together the Political Coalition of Andrean
Women), CONG de Mujeres, CEM-UCV, CISFEM, Frente
Continental de Mujeres, Unión de Mujeres Negras (states
of Portuguesa, Lara, Yaracuy y Sucre); Peru: Grupo
Impulsor Nacional Mujeres por la Igualdad Real; Paraguay:
Coordinación de Mujeres de Paraguay; Bolivia: CIDEM;
Chile: FLACSO, Iniciativa Chile; Brasil: Comité Impulsor
de Articulaçao de Mulheres Brasileiras; Uruguay:
Comisión Nacional de Seguimiento de Beijing; Guatemala:
Voces de Mujeres. Gathering of information was supported
by Articulación de ONG Feministas de América Latina y
el Caribe.
3 This is
the most recent data available after 1995
|