2000
Development in the Arab World and the Role of the Arab NGOs
Hassan Krayem; Adib Nehme; Ezzat Abdul Hadi
The Arab NGO Network for Development
Arab development and modernisation have suffered retreat and stagnation since the beginning of the 20th century. Social development had reached maturity with political, economic and social achievements that were gaining widespread popular support. But external and internal pressure put social development on a descending track and emptied it of substance. Developmental discourse disappeared and was replaced by a neo-liberal discourse focusing exclusively on economic growth. The return of developmental discourse is a reaction to global deterioration of living conditions especially since the 1980s under structural adjustment.
The
Arab development project
The
Arab NGO sector has an important role in development discourse today. It is
conscious of the need to avoid two extreme stands, the first being a rejection
of all things foreign that do not fit our social and historical characteristics,
the second exemplified by the simple and uncritical acceptance of
foreign influence. The Arab NGO sector looks at development as a firm option
derived from the rich experience of the Arab societies. At the national level,
it may include the following elements:
·
An increase in growth and productivity in association with regional and
social justice, especially on property and redistributive relations.
·
A democratic transformation of state and society including
decentralisation and full participation in the decision and policy-making
processes.
·
Abrogation of all forms of economic, social and legal discrimination
against women, youth and any segment of the population suffering from such
discrimination.
·
Strengthening of multi-level mechanisms for social and national
integration.
·
Strengthening of the culture of citizenship with values of participation,
self-reliance, tolerance and openness.
·
Recognition of the role of civil society organisations as essential
partners in decision-making
processes and strengthening their role along side the state.
The
Arab world: a panoramic view
The
Arab world is part of the third world and similar to other Southern states in
its history of merging into the global market. But particular characteristics
distinguish the Arab world from the rest of the South:
·
Crude
oil.
About two-thirds of the world's oil reserves lie in the Arab world. This
strategic commodity plays a significant role in economic growth in the Arab
world and increases the dangers associated with its control, as seen from the
Gulf wars. Monetary wealth accumulated in the Gulf states, especially after the
increase of the oil prices in 1973, but most of it went to security systems and
weapons that sucked surplus capital from the region and transferred it back to
developed countries.
·
Strategic
location.
The Arab world was strategically located in relation to the cold war and the
historical conflict centring on the Israeli settlement project in Palestine. As
a result, many Arab countries followed a pattern of militarisation allocating
economic resources to military budgets and weaponry, and five costly wars were
fought in the region.
·
Water.
Lack of water resources in the Arab world is a strategic and security issue as
well as a developmental issue. The Arab world has 5% of the world population but
only 1% of the available global water resources. More importantly, most of these
water resources are not controlled by the Arab states. Adaptation to lack of
water is pushing Arab states to abandon agriculture as the economic value of
water in agriculture is less than its value in industry or for domestic use.
·
Oil
prices.
Oil-producing states suffered from a sharp drop in oil prices, which resulted in
accumulated budget deficits and a decrease in redistribution of surpluses to
many groups in society.
·
Democracy.
Lack of democracy is reflected in lack of political participation,
authoritarian state machinery, and disrespect for human and minority
rights. Despite some political liberalisation since the late 1980s, increased
intensity of political and social polarisation threatens states with civil war
and social disintegration. Lack of democracy is an essential obstacle to
development in the Arab world.
·
Women.
In addition to the general socio-economic factors that hinder the integration of
women in society and their active participation in development, there are
special social and cultural factors relevant to the dominant traditional social
structure in the Arab world. The principle of equality between men and women
does not contradict the Arab values and is an important basis for development.
·
Labour
migration.
Some countries export skilled labour, leading to an uncompensated deficit, and
others import immigrant labour without appropriate protections for the
labourers.
·
Plurality.
There exist huge differences among the Arab states. Some states have tremendous
oil wealth and financial capabilities, but lack population and are mostly
deserts. Other states are large, heavily populated and have great agricultural
capabilities (Egypt and Sudan), but they lack capital.
Most
Arab countries have achieved significant progress in some social indicators
since 1970, but still occupy low positions relative to countries in other
regions except for sub-Saharan Africa. The differences among the countries would
argue for greater economic cooperation, but intra-Arab economic relations are
low compared with relations with other regions. Political relations among Arab
countries are also difficult, making real integration unrealistic. Reports show
that intra-Arab trade relations do not exceed four to 5% of the total Arab trade
volume.
Structural
adjustment policies
Structural
adjustment was meant to solve the socio-economic crisis, which in Arab countries
was caused by three factors: increased interest rates, protective measures by
industrial countries; and a drop in material prices, especially crude oil.
Decrease in the value of exports and subsequent decrease in capital transfer
from oil producing to other Arab countries led the latter to borrow to
compensate for these losses. At the end of 1998, the total value of external
debt had increased to about USD 201 billion or about 49.2% of GDP of all Arab
countries (the debt of all developing countries reached 26% of the GDP of all
developing countries). Structural adjustment also serves to open up Southern
markets, including Arab ones, to Western commodities. Most Arab countries have
agreed to implement SAPs. Morocco started in
1983, Tunisia in 1986, Jordan in 1989, Egypt in 1991, and Yemen and Algeria in 1995. The rest of Arab countries (eg, Lebanon, Syria and Sudan) have no formal SAP commitments.
Basic
development problems
The
basic problems of development in
the Arab world can be divided into five main categories.
Decline
in economic growth. Statistical
data show that the rate of productive labour and real wages in the Arab world
are equal to 1970 figures. Combined GDP reached USD 408 billion in 1997.
The annual rate of economic growth during the period of 1975-1995 was 3.2%
and it was estimated at 2% in 1999. Per capita income was USD 2,327 in 1975 and
USD 2,914 in 1980, but dropped to USD 1,842 in 1990. Attracting capital requires
relative political stability and essential economic reforms that do not yet
exist. Arab exports are growing slowly at a very low rate (1.5% in the recent
years in contrast with 10% for all developing countries and 6% globally).
Demographic
and labour problems. The
population growth rate declined in the last two decades from 3.2% in 1985 to
2.5% in 1996. Population, now at about 280 million, may reach 600 million in
2035, with dramatic increases in population
percentages of children under 15. The labour force grew at a rate of 3.2%
in the 1980s, 3.3% in the first half of the 1990’s and 3.7% in the second half
of the 1990s. Rates of unemployment and poverty increased. The estimated
unemployment rate for many Arab countries is no less than 15%. Strong
urban population growth is usually associated with “ruralisation” of the
city because of severe problems of housing, transportation and food. Slightly
more than half the population (52%) live in urban centres. The labour force is
characterised by low productivity, many unskilled workers (over 50%), high
percentages of child labour and a modest participation of women estimated at
about 19% in 1997. About 40% of the total labour force is in agriculture, 38% in
services and 22% in industry.
Problems
of the environment, agriculture, food and water. Only
70% of the population now has safe drinking water. The Arab world is considered
the most dependent on food imports. The imbalance in food provision is estimated
to be about 61% in 2000, with an estimated food gap value in 1995 of USD 12.7
billion (an 18.7% increase over 1994). Agriculture production reached about USD
74.6 billion in 1996, or 13.1% of GDP, increasing from 8.9% in 1985. The Arab
world still suffers from a variety of obstacles to food security, eg,
lack of water, climate change, soil erosion and desertification, weak
material and monetary capabilities, infrastructure deficiencies and skills
deficits. Negligence of the environment has an annual cost, according to many
experts, of USD 14 billion, or 3% of GDP. Air pollution affects over 60 million
urban inhabitants or about 40% of total urban populations (20% of the total
population). Fighting pollution and desertification would cost an estimated USD
58–78 billion in the next decade and is considered essential to development.
Social
and economic performance problems. In
most Arab countries, economic growth in the 1990s fell below population growth,
with the exception of Libya and the Gulf states. Industrial production as a
share of total GDP decreased from 35.3% in 1985 to 31.2% in 1996. Obstacles in
the industrial sector are: absence of an institutional structure appropriate to
industry itself; weakness of supporting services; national market limitations;
barriers to the free movement of commodities and individuals between the Arab
countries; and the higher cost and lower quality of industrial products making
it difficult to compete.
The
Arab world suffers from the absence of necessary plans and strategies
to address the the many social challenges. The housing problem is
intensifying and widespread poverty is growing. Illiteracy is estimated at 41.4%
and although it is decreasing as a percentage of population, the number of
illiterates is increasing. Illiteracy reaches 60% in some of the least developed
Arab countries and it drops to less than 20% in others (Lebanon and the Gulf
states). Female illiteracy is higher, reaching about 75% in Mauritania and
Yemen. The estimated average for all Arab countries in 1997 was 53.6%.
The
Gini Index is twice as high in the Arab world as it is in the other developing
countries (UNDP). In the 1960s, the difference in the per
capita income between the oil producing and the non-producing countries was
2 to 1; it reached 9 to 1 in 1987 and in 1999, it had increased to 33 to 1. The
average per capita income in Sudan is USD 480 while in the United Arab
Emirates it is USD 15,770.
There
are also significant cultural and political obstacles: firstly, the crisis of
democracy in the Arab world., which represents a threat to development and a
legitimacy crises for many Arab regimes. This endangers stability, weakens the
state institution, and undermines law. At the same time it strengthens the
authoritarian character of the state that does not recognise the rights of the
free citizens. On the other hand, the cultural identity crisis.
This crisis takes many religious forms. In essence, it stems from the
differences among systems of values and is a reflection of the Arab rejection of
and confrontation with Western cultural penetration that is also associated with
political and economic domination.
The
features of an alternative development
The
general characteristics of an alternative developmental plan should include the
following:
·
Democratisation
of political life at the level of the state and society.
It is not only necessary to increase the level of popular participation but also
vital to enhance the political legitimacy of the regime. The higher the level of
participation of citizens in the decision-making policies at all levels, the
greater the legitimacy and stability of the political system.
·
Decentralisation
of decision-making to municipalities
will improve services and make participation in development more effective.
Co-operative popular banks, educational institutions, and health service
providers depend on cooperation with municipalities, NGOs, private sector,
governmental agencies, trade unions, universities, and other civil society
organisations.
·
Redefinition
of the role of government.
Governments have a role to play in development planning and implementation of
social and economic policies to address the many existing problems. The state
should be an efficient, rational and economic manager that gives priority to the
social dimension of development and participates in providing the basic social
services. This conception of state does not accept the contradiction between
state and market and is based on the experiences of many East Asian states.
·
An
integrative development model.
Experiences in the last decades were classified under two extremes: the statist
model versus the neo-liberal market-oriented model. The new integrative approach
assumes different and complementary roles for the state, civil society and the
private commercial sector. The successful developmental experiences of many
Asian countries have shown that the active role of the state in planning,
providing the integrative framework to all parties and in playing an effective
role in providing social services, equal opportunity and equality was an
indispensable factor behind the success of these experiences.
·
Collaborative
policies integrating industry and agriculture
that lead to a qualitative improvement in the conditions of the agriculture.
This should decrease the level of dependency in essential needs and increase
self-reliance to satisfy local needs as well as bring about necessary reforms in
education and research.
·
Empowered
civil society organisations that
can effectively participate in
developmental plans through decreased government domination.
The
role of civil society and NGOs
In
the Arab world, ‘civil society’ is often used to express the traditional,
religious, sectarian, tribal and family structures still dominant in society.
This use of the term distorts it. ‘Civil society’ should refer to the modern
voluntary associations that belong in the modern state and are based on
citizenry and free association to promote collective interest. Democracy and
participation cannot be reduced to voting. Democracy means continuous
involvement of wide social segments in decision-making processes and in
supervision and execution of developmental projects. It requires a degree of
decentralisation beyond what exists in the Arab world.
Building
a strong, effective and efficient Arab NGO sector would involve the followings
steps:
·
Development
of an appropriate democratic and legal framework for Arab NGOs.
This framework has three interrelated elements. The first is legitimisation of
Arab NGOs based in UN conventions and international law, by allowing for freedom
of association at all levels. The second is independence meaning the right of
NGOs to define their own goals and missions, and respect by government and other
institutions for the organisational and administrative independence of NGOs. The
third is accountability, transparency, and monitoring of NGOs. These three
elements are equally important in an appropriate legal framework for NGOs.
·
Development
of a general conceptual framework for social policy.
National
public policy must be agreed upon between all effective forces in society,
especially between the public sector, the private sector and NGOs.
·
Formulation
of a model for professional cooperation between the national governments and the
NGO sector.
This model should be based on the concept of ‘full partnership’ between
national governments and Arab NGOs. A consultative mechanism should be
institutionalised to facilitate this process. Government should recognise that
the role of NGOs is not limited to providing services but it extends to the
development of democratic principles and practices in local communities. In our
view, the NGO sector has a comprehensive role to play in all spheres and sectors
of society.
·
Development
of a model for professional national and societal cooperation between NGOs and
the rest of the civil society organisations.
Civil society comprises NGOs, political parties, trade unions, the media, and
social movements among others. An
institutionalised, organised and continuous consultative mechanism among all
civil society organisations is needed. The relationship between NGOs and
political parties needs special attention, since political parties often seek to
dominate NGOs while NGOs seek to enhance their independence.
·
Strengthening,
empowering and enhancing the democratic structure of the Arab NGOs.
This work must focus on three interrelated spheres. The first is sound
management with a clear vision and agreed upon values, professional procedures
and transparency mechanisms. The second is improvement and development of
administrative and technical capabilities. Efficient administrative techniques
are needed to improve the quality of NGO services and enhance their relations
with local Arab communities. The third is human resource development and the
development of work ethics. This should include important issues like knowledge,
information skills and ethics. Capabilities should be built in accordance with
new NGO requirements, that is, the move from the mere provision of social
welfare to development. Professionalism should not be over-emphasised at the
expense of neglecting voluntary work, however.
·
Co-ordination,
cooperation, consultation and networking among the Arab NGO organisations.
One objective of the networks is to build a clear common and comprehensive
vision of social and economic development in Arab societies. Another purpose is
to develop strong local partners to national governments, partners who can
participate in the management of the developmental processes in Arab countries
and reflect local communities' perspectives in decision-making processes.
·
Achieving
self-reliance and self-financing.
Exclusive dependence on external finance threatens the existence of NGOs.
Self-reliance requires that NGOs enhance their relations with local communities.
Relations with the private sector should
be developed to create mechanisms to increase the role of the private sector in
the processes of development. Relations with international NGOs must also
continue to enhance mutual respect, common vision and real partnership,
especially in issues of strengthening democracy, social justice and human
rights.
·
Establishing
relations with Arab local communities.
The suggestion for a new integrative, institutionalised and systematic strategy
for relations between local communities and NGOs is an essential, important and
decisive manner for the effective intervention and sustainability of Arab NGOs.
|