|
Improved articulation between social programmes needed
Carlos Pentzke
Mario Céspedes
Programa de Participación Ciudadana
CEP - Alforja
Red Costarricense de Control Ciudadano
Some social indicators show an improvement but poverty has increased and salaries have decreased. Not all of the finance destined for the Social Development Fund actually goes into it and poor articulation between different assistance programmes impedes efficient management.
During 2006 the focus of debate and social mobilization
will be on the proposed Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between Costa Rica, the USA
and the Dominican Republic. The action will take place in several arenas: the
Legislative Assembly, where negotiations between political parties will result
in the approval or rejection of the agreement, the Chamber of Commerce, civil
society organizations and the streets, where the social movement holds sway. The
situation is becoming potentially conflictive because the government of Oscar
Arias, which took office in May, has failed to promote bridge building with the
various stakeholders, resulting in a radicalization of positions.
Social indicators: advances and setbacks
The prospects for a universal improvement in the quality
of life have deteriorated. This can be seen in an increased incidence of
poverty, reduced income from employment at all levels and reduced State provided
social security payments made to households through various programmes and
services. The poorest and most vulnerable social sectors are the hardest hit.
Life expectancy, child mortality and educational coverage
have shown a predictable improvement in view of the ongoing increases in public
expenditure. In 2004, child mortality was 9.25 per 1,000 live births, the lowest
rate in the history of the country. Secondary education coverage expanded with a
greater attendance at schools and other post-primary education facilities, but
at the same time dropout rates increased.
However, indexes for income generation, poverty,
employment and pensions, which indicate opportunity distribution through the
population, show clearly negative trends.
Measured in terms of income, poverty has increased from
18.5% to 21.7%. This represents approximately a million people and 38,000 poor
households. Measured in terms of unfulfilled basic needs, poverty affects 36% of
households and one in every three Costa Ricans. The situation is worst in the
metropolitan central region and in the south.
The average per capita income in households fell by 6% and
real minimum salaries decreased.
In 2005 the economy grew by 4.2% and 13,000 jobs were
created. In 2004 the unemployment rate for women was 8.5% and for men 5.4%.
Young people aged 16 to 20 experience particular difficulties, with an
unemployment rate for that group of 17.2%.
Some 45% of the economically active population contribute
to the pension system. Reforms were adopted in the system for invalidity, old
age and survivor benefit of the Costa Rica Social Security Fund, which has the
problem of a wide coverage (close to 87%) and a limited contributor base.
After a period of rapid advance in the acknowledgement of
women’s rights and other gender issues, some fundamental changes still have to
be addressed. In general, women’s employment situation is more precarious than
men’s and this is particularly so for self-employed women. At the same time, the
number of women holding political office has increased and women occupy 50.9% of
seats in the 2006-2010 Legislative Assembly.
Civil society keeps a wary eye on the FTA
Campaigning for the election, contested by the National
Liberation Party and the Civil Action Party, took place in the context of
polarized positions for and against the FTA. If approved, this agreement will
affect the region’s economic, legislative and social orientation, as well as
levels of political governance. Of the potential signatories Costa Rica is the
only one that has not yet finished its parliamentary discussion process on the
FTA. The main factor that has led to a change in the timetable for approval is
an increasing social opposition to it, expressed by the articulation of civil
society organizations in processes of information dissemination together with
the organization and mobilization of communities across the country. Public
Universities, the Ombudsman’s office, the Costa Rica Electricity Institute Board
of Directors and the Catholic Church’s Social Ministry, among others, have made
public their objections to the FTA. In addition, the narrow margin of victory in
the election (the National Liberation Party won by a mere 18.000 votes) has
denied the present Government team a clear-cut mandate.
The Government’s goal is a country “open” to foreign
investment as a foundation for economic growth in order to generate wealth that
will be re-distributed with compensatory mechanisms and policies to the social
sectors adversely affected by commercial liberalization. However, the poorest
provinces, the ones that practically delivered the election victory to Arias, do
not necessarily understand the relation between FTA approval and the capacity to
sustain long-term social programmes.
Poverty elimination strategies
The plans for combating poverty implemented during the
last two decades have not significantly reduced it. The situation has been
exacerbated by an accelerated demographic growth. In the middle of 2005 an audit
by the Comptroller General of the Republic detected a series of deficiencies in
the formulation of the New Life Plan, implemented by the administration of Abel
Pacheco (2000-2006). Irregularities dating from previous administrations were
identified in budgetary allocation and the implementation of assistance
programmes. These irregularities require structural corrections to ensure the
continuity of social programmes. Among other things, the audit detected
inconsistencies between the poverty reduction plan and the National Development
Plan, economic policy weaknesses incompatible with poverty reduction objectives
and a lack of communication between the Social Council and the Economic Council
on relevant issues. As a consequence, poverty elimination measures are haphazard
and have little impact. Also, institutional efforts to implement programmes take
place in a strategic framework that focuses on providing assistance to poor
families. This generates dependence on assistance. Defects were also found that
resulted in the exclusion of some of the communities that registered highest on
the poverty index.
Family Allocation Fund: weakened mechanism
The finance for the Social
Development and Family Allocation Fund (FODESAF) comes from a 5% company payroll
tax and 20% of sales tax income. It finances several social programmes
implemented through state institutions. Due to the nature of its funding
structure, the Fund’s actual resources vary according to the rhythm of the
economic cycle, which reduces its response capacity during periods of public
expenditure contraction. Although its legal status is maintained its weaknesses
are increasingly evident. The financial resources actually received by the Fund
and by social sector institutions are much less than the allocation authorized
by the Finance Ministry and some institutions are not able to apply all of the
resources allocated to them by the end of the year. The Fund registered a
surplus of CRC 5.7 billion (USD 11 million) in 2003 and of more than CRC 2
billion (USD 3.9 million) in 2004.
According to the latest State
of the Nation Report (2005) the real value of resources provided to the FODESAF
by the Finance Ministry diminished by 23% between 2000 and 2004. Also, according
to Marcela Román, one of the Report’s expert authors, the stipulation that 20%
of sales tax income be allocated to the FODESAF has not been complied with since
the late 1980s.
Table 1. Transfers to the
FODESAF from Sales Tax (S/T) - 2000-2005 (in million CRC, with CRC 510 = USD 1)
|
Year |
Authorized transfer to
FODESAF in the national budget from S/T |
Authorized transfer as
a percentage of total income from S/T |
Actual transfer
|
Actual transfer as a
percentage of total income from S/T |
Estimated total income
from S/T |
|
2000 |
42,300 |
12.07 |
18,198 |
5.19 |
350,250 |
|
2001 |
48,739 |
12.18 |
12,500 |
3.12 |
400,100 |
|
2002 |
51,944 |
15.53 |
24,183 |
7.23 |
334,475 |
|
2003 |
19,687 |
4.73 |
10,845 |
2.60 |
415,850 |
|
2004 |
20,938 |
4.00 |
2,000* |
0.43** |
456,340 |
|
2005 |
25,000*** |
4.83 |
---------- |
------------- |
517,000 |
Source: DESAF.
* Sum actually transferred up
to 31 October 2004
** Percentage corresponding to
the sum actually transferred up to 31 October 2004
*** Sum approved in the first legislative debate on the
National Budget Project for 2005, in November 2004. However the Budget project
formulated by the Executive proposed an allocation to FODESAF of only CRC
10,498.8 million.
As shown in the State of the Nation report the Comptroller
General of the Republic revealed that in 2004 institutions implementing social
programmes registered a surplus of CRC 17.5 billion (USD 34 million) in spite of
the fact that in real terms their allocation had decreased. This surplus was
almost equivalent to the sum allocated to them in the National Budget. A partial
explanation for this is that the Finance Ministry tends to transfer resources to
the institutions in the last month of the year, which prevents the
implementation of activities planned for that year. In addition Budget Law
provisions prevent institutions from making use of these funds during the
following year. It is not clear whether by this device the Finance Ministry
seeks to reduce public expenditure through non-implementation or, even worse, if
it is obeying a hidden strategy to reduce state capacity for exercising social
policy.
Social Watch activities
The Costa Rica Social Watch Network organized activities
within the framework of the Global Call to Action against Poverty campaign
including information dissemination, training, the formulation of a document
critically analysing poverty in the country and a campaign in the mass media. In
addition activities linked to civil mobilization against the FTA were organized,
since this agreement represents an institutional framework that would reduce the
State’s capacity to design and implement social policies.
Injunction writ
In mid-2005 a delegation of representatives from social
organizations and FODESAF beneficiaries sought an injunction writ in the
Constitutional Court demanding the immediate provision of due resources to the
Fund to ensure compliance with requirements established in various articles of
the Constitution and to meet the basic needs of the population, as well as
measures against public officers for not having lodged the pertinent legal
actions necessary to comply with juridical obligations in relation to the Fund.
It was also requested that the Costa Rica Social Security Fund be provided with
its due funds. In May 2006, almost a year later, the Constitutional Court
delivered its ruling to the organizations of the Social Watch Network granting
the injunction writ and “warning the public officers concerned not to repeat in
future the omissions cited in support of the injunction.” Under the ruling the
State was ordered to pay costs and damages.
In addition the Network’s report on poverty in the country
was presented to government authorities, members of the Legislative Assembly,
public institution officers, the media, international bodies and representatives
of social organizations. This report proposes, among others, the following
initiatives:
·
The formulation of an equitable national employment policy that
accommodates gender, ethnic-cultural and regional differences and is based on
employment development criteria rather than macroeconomic indexes.
·
The implementation of a development strategy based on the
decentralization of State functions and public services through local government
strengthening and civil society participation.
·
The promotion of a rural development policy that incorporates
smallholdings, the development of organic production technologies and
agro-industry and guarantees food security and national self-sufficiency.
·
The implementation of educational reform through State policy that
transcends political-electoral cycles, guarantees access to free education and
encourages humanitarian values that will promote the development of a citizenry
committed to building a free, democratic and independent society based on
tolerance and solidarity.
·
The re-direction of FODESAF resources to families and persons excluded
from the economically active population, in order to fulfil the constitutional
requirement for adequate wealth sharing. The procurement of an immediate
provision of finance legally due to the Fund and the re-definition of its
objectives along with the articulation of its efforts with civil society
organizations and institutions.
References
Programa
Estado de la Nación (2005). Estado de la Nación en Desarrollo Humano
Sostenible. San José de Costa Rica, p. 49-54.
Morales,
A. (2004). Análisis de Coyuntura. Costa Rica.
Unpublished.
Economic
Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (2005). Balance
preliminar de las economías de América Latina y el Caribe.
Defensoría de los Habitantes
(DESAF) (2005). Informe final sobre el financiamiento y
administración del fondo de desarrollo social y asignaciones familiares.
Documentos de la Red
Costarricense de Control Ciudadano (2005).
|