Social Debt: the difficult commitment
Thelma Mejía
IPS Special report for Social Watch
Honduras is at loggerheads with the challenge of social debt at the dawn of the new millemium, an increasingly difficult commitment, where State efforts have done little to stop the breach from widening while still has no clear social policy. The social debt, perceived under the "welfare mentality" of the government is linked only to action like the provision of vouchers and food for work in the most hard-hit areas of the nation, according to an official report.
This paper, entitled "Poverty
and Social Policy," produced by the Technical
Secretariat of Cooperation, says the nation needs to
overcome its "welfare mentality," promoting
real development opportunities for those facing social
disadvantage as a result of their poverty.
Guillermo Molina,
Cooperation minister, said Honduras is facing the
challenge of carrying ahead a "social policy
which will allow us to overcome the problem of poverty
and offer life opportunities for the population."
He stated that for this
to occur there was a need for economic growth with equity
combining productive employment generation with better
salaries, an increase in investment and social policies
aimed at integrating the marginalised sectors.
The source of his
concern stemmed from the Techcial Secretariat of
Cooperation statement that the percentage of families
under the poverty line now stood at 75.6 % of the
national population, meaning 81 % of a total population
of 5.8 million people.
At the same time, 54.5
% of homes are indigent, affecting 61.9 % of all the
population, and meaning barely 24.4 % of homes are in the
"non-poor" bracket.
It is the rural area
which still have the highest poverty indices, especially
in the Western region, where most of the indigenous
people live, and where the official report states 96 % of
homes are under the poverty line.
The next most critical
area is in the south of the country, especially in the
departments of Chouteca and Valle, where 78 % of people,
estimated at just over 300 thousand people, live under
the poverty line.
And even though the
country took on commitments to stop the advance of
poverty and to improve the social and human conditions of
the population in the Social Summit in Copenhagen,
Denmark, these have not been put into practice mainly due
to the economic adjustment processes started in 1990.
Nelson Avila, a
Honduran consultant working with the InterAmerican
Development Bank (IDB), said without doubt the economic
adjustment policies, "took the Hondurans unawares
and the result is that today we have a greater number of
poor, a higher unemployment index and little social
action as there is no integral project for the
country."
Avila believes the
governments must adopt a supportive economic model, where
broad participation is offered to the developing social
sectors of the nation, as part of a plan to guarantee
true sustained economic growth.
In his opinion, there
is no point in the government designing
"palliative" social programmes for the economic
adjustments when "these do not reach all the
population and there is a risk of falling into
paternalism, something which far from helping damages us
as it makes us used to schemes of dependence."
"I think only a
supportive economic model is the real base for combatting
poverty in Honduras if we want to enter the new century
with a clean shiny face and we must dedicate ourselves to
not wasting time like we have done up to now,"
he said.
The social situation of
the country, in terms of poverty and citizen insecurity,
is one of the problems most analysed by various social
entities, especially the human rights groups, which see
poverty as a sort of "time bomb" on the point
of exploding.
The Committee for the
Defence of Human Rights in Honduras (CODEH) released a
proposal entitled "Alternative Development
Model" half way through this year, with the emphasis
on economic, social and cultural rights.
This proposal, agreed
with various sectors of civil society, concluded that the
"human face" of the economic adjustments
promised by Honduran President Carlos Reina failed as
action was concentrated on reducing the fiscal deficit
and paying foreign debt servicing, calculated at more
than four billion dollars.
According to the
proposal drawn up by CODEH, in 1995 alone, the government
used 35 % of its income in servicing the foreign debt, in
1996, this rose to 41 %, and this year's total will be
around 42 %, equivalent to 700 million dollars - more
than half the nation's 1.2 billion dollar annual income
from exports.
Furthermore, it adds,
the extreme social polarisation seen in the country
confirms only 35.5 % of the remaining income not used to
pay off foreign debt goes to the poorer four fifths of
the population, while the remaining 20 % take 67.5 %.
According to CODEH
leader, Ramon Custodio, in 1995, the basic cost of the
family basket of goods for a five person home was around
256.9 dollars per month, a figure far above the 60 to 136
dollars per month earned by rural workers and
professionals in this country.
And to deal with this,
he proposed a "reorientation" of the current
social and economic policies where civil society has more
active participation in order to "detect foreign
impositions which do not fit in with out system and way
of life."
Up until now, the
proposal made by this human rights group has been the
most solid and substantial effort made in the last five
years by civil society, which is slowly gaining greater
presence in demanding political, social and cultural
rights.
For analyst, Victor
Meza, the problem of the social debt in Honduras is
tightly linked to the democratic development of the
country, characterised by a divorce between the political
and social agendas. According to Meza, poverty is one of
the main challenges facing the nation on the threshold of
the new century, where "unfortunately, our
governments still do not understand the need to design a
true platform of development to replace the rhetorical,
almost lyrical line with a practical, palpable and
concrete alternative."
|